Chillingly, more than three years since the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) sounded the initial alarm bell, Uganda’s financial sector continues to teeter on the precipice of an international blacklist.
The intergovernmental giant, known for its unwavering vigilance against global financial crime, looked at the progress Uganda has made in consolidating its financial fortress and found it alarmingly inadequate.
An approved action plan was key to rescue, but it expires in May 2022, leaving Uganda gasping for air.
The country is in danger of being shrouded in international shame.
The set of requirements issued by the FATF look like a financial apocalypse: new laws, policies, regulations and a major boost in institutional capabilities to defend against the threats of money laundering, illicit financing and terrorist financing.
In a clear statement, the FATF stipulates that Uganda must make significant progress in implementing its action plan by June 2023 or face the specter of “next step” due to insufficient progress.
The Financial Intelligence Agency (FIA) is determined and has promised to be out of trouble by the end of the year.
Compliance director Fiona Nabaggala defiantly claimed that the FIA, along with the indomitable Bank of Uganda and other authorities, had overcome most of the demands.
Only the filing of beneficial ownership information is the only sentinel, which is expected to yield next week. She lamented that Uganda’s inclusion in the gray list was a painful blow to the country’s financial soul.
In response to the Financial Action Task Force’s ominous predictions, the legislature spawned the Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Bill, wielding punitive measures and other powerful weapons.
The financial sanctions of the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Act act like a double-edged sword, while the Companies (Amendment) Act demystifies beneficial ownership.
However, the shroud of gray listing has imposed high costs on Uganda, from staggering electronic and financial transfer fees to high prices for processing letters of credit.
Overseas remittances have stalled as dollar inflows have dwindled amid uncertainty, transaction fees have surged.
As the June deadline approaches, the deputy executive director of the FIA Uganda is optimistic that an exit strategy will be in place by the end of the year. However, the few remaining obstacles are obscured by the harsh words wielded by the FATF like the sword of Damocles.
The gray list is a testament to a country’s vulnerability in combating financial malignancy, shielding those whose enforcement regimes resemble paper tigers. The Financial Action Task Force’s clarion call sounded, urging Uganda to avoid the threat of further retaliation.
Edwin Nakaana Ssenyonyi is a passionate advocate for enlightenment, imploring Ugandans and their guardians to understand the consequences of greylisting.
As the EU wields the blacklist as a cudgel, investment arteries constrict, international transactions grind to a halt and even the lifeblood of remittances dwindles.
Under the guidance of the Bank of Uganda’s precepts, regulated financial institutions moved in unison and played a symphony of resilience. The penalties are etched in stone, a testament to the industry’s determination.
While South Africa and Nigeria join Uganda on the precarious gray list, compliance advocates such as Morocco and Cambodia have prevailed, rolling out new loyalty measures. In a case of financial notoriety, North Korea and Iraq were blacklisted.
Michael Mugabi, stalwart chairman of the Uganda Institute of Banking and Financial Services, has highlighted the sector’s critical role in combating financial wrongdoing. The clarion call to arms echoed, urging a united front to fight the crime wave.
Nabagara remains ever vigilant, identifying illusive adversaries in the ever-shifting sands of technology. The clarion call for permanent system upgrades is a testament to Uganda’s determination in the face of adversity.
Have a story or opinion from your community to share with us: please email editorial@watchdoguganda.com
